Showing posts with label ban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ban. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Watch To ban mosque is to subvert Constitution

Enjoy To ban mosque is to subvert Constitution

Editor's note: Roland S. Martin, a CNN political analyst, is a syndicated columnist and author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith," and the new book, "The First: President Barack Obama's Road to the White House." He is a commentator for TV One Cable Network and host of a Sunday morning news show.
(CNN) -- "My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution."
Those eloquent words were spoken on July 25, 1974, by an outstanding woman and fellow Texan, Rep. Barbara Jordan, when she was a member of the House Judiciary Committee investigating the impeachment of President Richard Nixon.
And as I have listened and watched the stunning debate over the potential location of an Islamic community center and mosque two blocks away from where the World Trade Center towers were destroyed on September 11, 2001, Jordan's precise words keep coming to mind.
In the aftermath of the tragic 9/11 attacks, the refrain from many Americans was that it was critical for the United States to prevent the terrorists, al Qaeda, from taking away what we wrested from the British between 1775 and 1783 -- our independence and democracy.
Yet in our zeal to fight terrorism worldwide, we have chipped away at our precious rights, willing to surrender hard-fought civil liberties under the guise of protecting ourselves from terrorists at home and abroad. Today, we are a nation embroiled in a local zoning dispute over a plan for a 13-story Islamic cultural center that will house a mosque, theater and other amenities.
It has been inaccurately described as the "ground zero mosque," a ridiculous term considering it will be two blocks away from the site of the fallen World Trade Center towers.
What has been fascinating and demoralizing to watch is the clear and unmistakable religious bigotry that has taken over this conversation. Critics of the project contend that they are not trying to trample on our precious constitutional right of religious freedom by opposing the project. They contend that it is simply in bad taste to build it so close to ground zero, and that Americans are far too emotional about the issue.
Others words really come to mind. Irrational. Hysterical. Intolerant. Hypocritical.
Over the last several years, we have seen American troops shedding blood on the battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan, fighting for American liberty and values. We hold ourselves up with self-righteousness as the paragon of democracy and freedom, yet we are quick to stifle the freedom of others we simply don't agree with.
A lot of the hateful rhetoric spewing out of talk radio, on blogs and on mainstream TV stems from a deep-seated mistrust, hatred and dislike of anyone practicing Islam.
In our politically correct way, we say we respect Muslims who aren't intent on launching a jihad, but the venom in the words of many reveals that isn't true. In a debate on CNN, James Carville talked about his Muslim friends being sickened by this attitude, only to see Bill Bennett then ask if those friends had publicly repudiated the Muslims involved in 9/11 and terrorism.
Is that what we've come to? We want to demand to see IDs of Hispanic-looking folks who might be here illegally, but we also want American Muslims to prove their patriotism by denouncing any and every crazed and deranged Muslim in the world who seeks to do us harm. Never mind that we have Muslims fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan; prove yourselves to be worthy Americans who are on "our side."
The pain and heartache that was created on 9/11 was unbearable for many. The nation was traumatized, shocked and paralyzed by the brazen acts caused by the bastards who swore allegiance, not to peace, but to a murderous man named Osama bin Laden and a loose-knit terror network named al Qaeda.
Coppied by http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/08/20/martin.mosque.constitution/index.html?hpt=C2#fbid=BRhT0Nxv594&wom=false

Friday, 20 August 2010

Ban releases rival, independent reports on Gaza conflict


Watches this Ban releases rival, independent reports on Gaza conflict

UNITED NATIONS: Secretary General Ban Ki-moon late Wednesday released the results of Israeli and Palestinian investigations into alleged war crimes during the conflict in Gaza in the winter of 2008-2009 which did not appear to include any input from Gaza’s Hamas rulers.

Ban introduced the 247-page report with brief observations that made no comment on the submissions by Israel or the Palestinians that were requested by the General Assembly.

He said it was important to respect international human rights and humanitarian law and voiced hope that “steps will be taken wherever there are credible allegations of violations.”

Last November, the UN gave Israel and the Palestinians three months to undertake “independent, credible investigations” into the findings of a UN-appointed expert panel, chaired by South African Judge Richard Goldstone.

In February, it gave both sides an additional five months to conduct their inquiries.

The 575-page Goldstone report concluded that both sides committed war crimes and possible crimes against humanity during the Gaza war, in which 13 Israelis and almost 1,400 Palestinians were killed, including many civilians.

It said Israel used disproportionate force, deliberately targeted civilians, used Palestinians as human shields, and destroyed civilian infrastructure during its three-week incursion into the Gaza Strip from December 27, 2008, to January 18, 2009, to root out Palestinian rocket squads. It accused Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas, of deliberately targeting civilians and trying to spread terror through rocket attacks on southern Israel.

Both sides rejected the charges when the Goldstone report was issued, and their positions remained unchanged in the newly released reports.


The General Assembly resolution warned of possible “further action” by UN bodies, including the Security Council, if both sides didn’t conduct independent and credible investigations. Whether the assembly plans any follow-up to Wednesday’s report remains to be seen.

Human Rights Watch called on governments and the UN to maintain pressure on Israel and Hamas to conduct thorough and impartial investigations, and to provide justice to victims of abuses.

Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=118387#ixzz0x8wV9a9n
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb)
coppied by http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=118387#axzz0x8w7BAGK

Saturday, 14 August 2010

Watches this Russia ban on grain export begins


Enjoy Russia ban on grain export begins
Russia has imposed a ban on grain exports until the end of the year, after a severe drought and a spate of wildfires devastated crops.

Russia is one of the world's biggest producers of wheat, barley and rye, and the ban is likely to see bread prices rise in places like the Middle East.

The measures are designed to keep domestic food prices under control.

But Agriculture Ministry data has revealed that this year's crop is unlikely to meet even domestic demand.

Continue reading the main story
Related stories

Heatwave to slow Russian recovery
Putin tackles Russian wildfires
Global wheat supply forecast cut
The fertile fields of southern Russia, which normally help to feed the world, have been left parched by months of no rain. The grain harvest is down by at least a third compared with last year.

The BBC's Richard Galpin in Moscow says that it comes as no surprise that Russia is temporarily banning exports as it seeks to stop prices sky-rocketing at home.

There are already reports of steep hikes in the price of flour around the country, and in Moscow the price of bread has jumped by 20%.

Correspondents say the temporary ban is being motivated by more than just economics - Russians eat bread with practically everything and rising bread prices is an issue which has traditionally had the power to stoke popular unrest.

Shortfall
The country's leadership has so far been unable to say when the ban might end.

President Dmitry Medvedev predicted that the measures could be lifted before the end of the year.

Shortfall
The country's leadership has so far been unable to say when the ban might end.

President Dmitry Medvedev predicted that the measures could be lifted before the end of the year.

Continue reading the main story
WHEAT FUTURES US CENTS/BUSHEL
LAST UPDATED AT 13 AUG 2010, 18:45 GMT

price change %
702.50 - -11.00 - -1.47
More data on this commodity
But Prime Minister Vladimir Putin suggested the ban could remain in place until well into 2011.

Mr Putin said that this year's crop could be as low as 60m tonnes, well below last year's 97m, and Russia needs almost 80m tonnes to cover domestic consumption, so even with this ban, there might be a shortfall of nearly 20m tonnes for the Russian consumer.

The Kremlin says talks on the issue will be held in October.

Last year, Russia exported a quarter of its 2009 grain output.

Russia produces a soft type of wheat that is suited to making unleavened bread, so much of its wheat is exported to the Middle East.

Egypt is its largest market, followed by Turkey, Syria, Iran and Libya.

Analysts say there is likely to be a small increase in bread prices in the short term.

But they say wheat prices should soon fall back down again because the US - the world's biggest exporter - is predicting a bumper harvest of its current crop.

This week economists predicted that the heatwave and wildfires would cut $15bn (£9bn) from Russian economic output.

The figure, which does not include the cost of rebuilding hundreds of destroyed homes, is predicted to slow down the country's recovery from the recent global crisis.

Nuclear facility
Hundreds of wildfires have been burning across central Russia in the last three weeks.


The fires have killed more than 50 people so far
More than 50 people have died in the fires and many more are thought to have been adversely affected by smog which has enveloped Moscow and other areas.

Moscow's daily death rate is twice what it would be normally for the current time of year. While officials have been careful not to link this to the heat and smog, doctors have been doing so off the record.

On Saturday, heavy rain cooled the capital, providing respite from the record-breaking temperatures and the smog for the first time in weeks.

However, dozens of wildfires are still burning around Moscow, and according to the Emergency Situations Ministry more than 500 wildfires are continuing to burn across the country.

These include a new blaze to the east of the major nuclear research facility in Sarov, about 400km (250 miles) east of Moscow.

Earlier this month, as fires raged near the site, all nuclear and explosive materials were removed as a precaution.

When those fires were brought under control, the materials were returned to Sarov.

However, Sergei Novikov, a spokesman for the Rosatom state atomic corporation, told the Associated Press that there was no immediate need to move them out again.
Coppied by http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-10977955